AI Real Estate Analyst
Claude Code skill pack for property research, comps, and investment analysis.
About
A Claude Code skill pack that turns the CLI into a property research system. Five parallel agents analyze a property across value, income potential, neighborhood quality, investment upside, and market conditions, then produce a composite Property Score (0-100) with a letter grade and a buy/hold/pass signal. Fifteen skills cover comparable sales, rental cash flow, BRRRR and fix-and-flip scenarios, mortgage math, MLS-ready listing copy, market analysis, property screening, commercial analysis, and 6-page PDF reports. The repo has 182 GitHub stars and is MIT licensed, with a one-command installer. Honest caveat, stated by the repo itself: outputs are AI-generated approximations from public data, not investment advice — verify everything with licensed professionals before acting on it.
What it can do
- Full property analysis with 5 parallel agents
- Property Score (0-100) with grade and buy/hold/pass signal
- Comparable sales and cash flow projections
- BRRRR, buy-and-hold, and fix-and-flip scenarios
- MLS-ready listing descriptions
- Mortgage calculator and market analysis
- Professional 6-page PDF reports
Setup
One-command install on macOS/Linux:
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zubair-trabzada/ai-realestate-claude/main/install.sh | bash
Then open Claude Code and use /realestate commands (analyze, comps, rental, listing, invest, neighborhood, flip, commercial, mortgage, market, compare, screen, report-pdf).
Prerequisites
Claude Code CLI; Python 3.8+; Git (reportlab installs automatically).
Use cases
Works with
Trust score — 9/10
Scored 9/10 (verified tier, metrics-v1). Evidence: Live GitHub repo page read: 182 stars, MIT license, not a fork, one-command install.sh verified verbatim from README.; 15 skills / 5 agents / PDF reports documented in README; requirements (Python 3.8+, Claude Code CLI) listed.; Repo's own disclaimer (not investment advice) reflected in entry; no hands-on testing claimed..
★ 182 GitHub stars
Sources
Every fact above was checked against these sources. Where a claim comes from the provider and couldn't be independently verified, the text says so.