frontend-ui-ux-skill
Evidence-based UI/UX and frontend-engineering doctrine skill, cited back to HCI research.
About
A single-skill doctrine for frontend work: five pillars covering interaction design (Nielsen heuristics, Fitts's/Hick's laws), visual system, architecture, WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, and Core Web Vitals, closing with a Definition of Done checklist. Deeper references (HCI foundations, full WCAG checklist, performance thresholds, anti-patterns) load on demand so small tasks stay cheap.
It's one author's project (3 stars, single commit), but the content is unusually well-cited for a skill and it avoids the generic design-skill mush. MIT.
What it can do
- Five-pillar frontend doctrine (interaction, visual, architecture, a11y, performance)
- Definition of Done checklist before calling UI work finished
- On-demand reference docs (HCI citations, WCAG 2.2 AA, Core Web Vitals)
- Anti-pattern library (visual + engineering)
- Framework-agnostic rules
Setup
- Personal install: git clone https://github.com/overseek944/frontend-ui-ux-skill.git ~/.claude/skills/frontend-ui-ux
- Project-only: git clone https://github.com/overseek944/frontend-ui-ux-skill.git <your-project>/.claude/skills/frontend-ui-ux
- Invoke automatically on frontend work or explicitly via /frontend-ui-ux
Prerequisites
Claude Code CLI
Use cases
Works with
Trust score — 6/10
Scored 6/10 (metrics tier, metrics-v1). Evidence: 3 stars, 1 commit, single author — thin vetting; unusually well-cited: Nielsen, Fitts, WCAG 2.2, Core Web Vitals; on-demand references keep context cost down; MIT. License: MIT.
★ 3 GitHub stars
How the trust score is built
Full methodology →- Adoption · stars/downloads, log-scaled vs peers
- 3.0/10
- Maintenance · recency, releases, issue load
- 5.0/10
- Openness · license + docs
- 8.0/10
- Manual review · sanity read + red-flag check
- 6.0/10
- · 3 stars, 1 commit, single author — thin vetting
- · unusually well-cited: Nielsen, Fitts, WCAG 2.2, Core Web Vitals
- · on-demand references keep context cost down
- · MIT
Sources
Every fact above was checked against these sources. Where a claim comes from the provider and couldn't be independently verified, the text says so.