Skip to content
← Tools / Skills
ToolInfisical/10 trustVerified
Infisical logo

Infisical

Open-source secrets management platform you can self-host, with AI-agent credential security.

Visit official site →

About

Infisical is an open-source (MIT) secrets management platform positioned as the self-hostable alternative to HashiCorp Vault and Doppler. With over 25,000 GitHub stars and customers including Hugging Face, Cisco, and Siemens, it covers the full secrets lifecycle: version-controlled storage, automatic rotation, dynamic secrets, certificate management, privileged access, and secret scanning with leak prevention.

Teams use a unified dashboard with granular RBAC and audit logs, a CLI (infisical run) that injects secrets as environment variables, SDKs and APIs, plus a Kubernetes operator, Terraform provider, and CI integrations. The architecture is deliberately simple — PostgreSQL and Redis, no Raft cluster to operate — which is why teams migrating off Vault cite it. Recent additions include an Agent Vault that proxies AI-agent credentials so LLMs never see plaintext secrets. The free cloud tier covers unlimited secrets for up to 5 team members; enterprise features like SAML/SSO, multi-region replication, and custom RBAC are paid.

What it can do

  • Open-source MIT core with self-hosting on your own infrastructure
  • CLI, SDKs, and APIs injecting secrets as environment variables
  • Dynamic secrets, automatic rotation, and secret scanning with leak prevention
  • Kubernetes operator, Terraform provider, and Agent Vault for AI-agent credentials

Setup

Use Infisical Cloud with a free account, or self-host with Docker/PostgreSQL. Install the CLI via brew install infisical/get-cli/infisical, then infisical login and infisical init.

Prerequisites

For self-hosting: Docker with PostgreSQL and Redis. For cloud: just an account.

Use cases

secrets-managementself-hosteddevopsai-agents

Works with

Trust score — 8/10

/10 trustVerified

Scored 8/10 (verified tier, metrics-v1). Evidence: Verified via vendor site/docs/GitHub and reputable coverage, wave 65; Trending score 85/100 from researcher assessment.

★ 25,000 GitHub stars

Sources

Every fact above was checked against these sources. Where a claim comes from the provider and couldn't be independently verified, the text says so.