Interviewer.AI
AI-driven video interviewing from Singapore: resume scoring, skill tests, and async video interviews to shortlist candidates before live rounds.
About
Interviewer.AI is a video-first screening platform aimed at the top of the funnel. Employers upload resumes and the system scores them on interpretation, experience, education, and skills, then invites candidates to asynchronous video interviews where AI analyzes both psychological and technical factors. The pitch is that a few minutes on the platform replaces a 30-minute first interview, with time to hire under two weeks in typical use.
Founded in 2018 in Singapore and available in 4 languages, it also runs an interview-coaching product for students and universities. Pricing is listed from about $39/mo billed yearly on third-party comparison sites. Reviewers note a 10-minute interview length cap and limited white-labeling as constraints, and like most video-screening tools it publishes no independent bias audit of its automated scoring.
What it can do
- AI resume scoring across experience, education, and skills
- Asynchronous video interviews with automated scoring
- Short skill assessment tests and test authoring
- Candidate comparison dashboards and real-time reporting
- Interview practice mode and coaching for universities
- Integrations with Greenhouse, Zapier, and Axis LMS
Setup
- Sign up at interviewer.ai (free trial, no credit card on most plans).
- Post a role and let the AI score uploaded resumes.
- Send async video interview invites with AI-generated or custom questions.
- Review scored profiles, transcripts, and shortlists in the dashboard.
Prerequisites
Use cases
Works with
Trust score — 5/10
Scored 5/10 (metrics tier, metrics-v1). Evidence: founded 2018 in Singapore per G2 and Capterra profiles; resume scoring plus async video interviews described consistently across G2, Capterra, and Slashdot; ~$39/mo entry pricing from spotsaas and $49/mo/user from slashdot comparisons. Strengths: long-lived product with verified reviews, affordable entry price, API and ATS integrations. Docked for: (1) almost all coverage comes from directories and comparison pages rather than independent press or user case studies; (2) no independent bias audit published for its AI scoring, and AI analysis claims are vendor-described. License: proprietary.
How the trust score is built
Full methodology →- Adoption · stars/downloads, log-scaled vs peers
- 5.0/10
- Maintenance · recency, releases, issue load
- 6.0/10
- Openness · license + docs
- 5.0/10
- Manual review · sanity read + red-flag check
- 6.0/10
- · Singapore-based, founded 2018; async video interviews + AI resume scoring in 4 languages (G2, Capterra profiles)
- · Entry pricing ~$39/mo billed yearly / $49/mo per user from third-party comparison sites (spotsaas, slashdot)
- · Integrations: Greenhouse, Zapier, Axis LMS; API access
- · Coverage is mostly directories/comparison pages; no independent bias audit published for AI scoring
Sources
Every fact above was checked against these sources. Where a claim comes from the provider and couldn't be independently verified, the text says so.