Skip to content
← Tools / Skills
ToolMobb/10 trustMetrics-checked

Mobb

AI vulnerability auto-remediation — turns SAST findings into developer-approved fixes in minutes, not hours.

Visit official site →

About

Mobb is an automated vulnerability remediation platform that sits downstream of your scanners and generates fixes developers actually merge. When a SAST scan (notably via its Checkmarx integration) flags a finding, Mobb analyzes the vulnerable code's context, matches it against prepared fix algorithms, and presents the fix side-by-side with the original code for one-click approval. Its AI Fix Agent, launched January 2025, extends this to autonomous triage of new findings as they appear, aiming to stop security debt from accumulating. The company claims it cuts average time-to-remediation by 99%, from hours to minutes.

The honest picture: Mobb fixes what your scanners find — it doesn't find vulnerabilities itself, so scanner quality bounds its value. Fix algorithms cover supported vulnerability classes well but novel or framework-specific issues still need humans. The 99% remediation-time claim is vendor-reported; validate on your own codebase with a trial. Pricing is enterprise-negotiated rather than transparent self-serve.

What it can do

  • Automatic fix generation for SAST findings with side-by-side diffs
  • AI Fix Agent for autonomous triage of new vulnerabilities
  • Checkmarx and multi-scanner integrations
  • Developer approval workflow — fixes land as branches/PRs
  • Fix verification by re-running scans after merge

Setup

Connect Mobb to your Git provider and SAST scanner (e.g., Checkly-free — Checkmarx, or other SARIF sources). Findings flow in automatically; review and approve fixes from the Mobb dashboard or PRs.

Prerequisites

A SAST/SCA scanner producing findings; GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket repositories.

Use cases

securityvulnerability-managementdevsecopsai-agents

Works with

Trust score — 7/10

/10 trustMetrics-checked

Scored 7/10 (metrics tier, metrics-v1). Evidence: Verified via vendor site/docs/GitHub and reputable coverage, wave 53; Trending score 68/100 from researcher assessment.

Sources

Every fact above was checked against these sources. Where a claim comes from the provider and couldn't be independently verified, the text says so.