Sapia.ai
AI chat interviews that screen every candidate for high-volume hiring.
About
Sapia.ai runs structured, text-based AI interviews to screen candidates early in the funnel, aimed at high-volume enterprise hiring in retail, hospitality, contact centers, and similar sectors. Candidates answer five structured questions by chat instead of submitting resumes; the platform scores personality traits, behavioral competencies, and communication skills against role models and returns a ranked shortlist. Enterprise customers named by the company include Qantas, BT Group, and Costa Coffee, with reported time-to-hire reductions of up to 90% — company-reported figures. The platform also offers video interviews, a talent hub, and integrations with Greenhouse, Lever, Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, SmartRecruiters, and iCIMS. Pricing is quote-based and not published; third-party estimates range from around $100/month starter tiers to roughly $2,000/month enterprise, and a UK public-sector pricing document listed a Pro tier at 28,000 GBP per year. Limitations: the text-only format misses non-verbal cues, pricing opacity forces a sales conversation, and teams unfamiliar with AI hiring need change management to trust the shortlists.
What it can do
- AI chat interviews; video interviews; candidate scoring and ranking; talent hub; diversity metrics; ATS integrations; candidate feedback at scale.
Setup
Work with Sapia to define role traits; embed the chat interview link in job ads; connect your ATS.
Prerequisites
High application volumes to justify enterprise pricing; ATS for shortlist handoff.
Use cases
Works with
Trust score — 7/10
Scored 7/10 (verified tier, metrics-v1). Evidence: Structured AI chat interviews, role-model scoring, and enterprise client names (Qantas, BT, Costa) confirmed on sapia.ai and third-party coverage.; UK G-Cloud pricing document corroborates enterprise pricing (~GBP 28k/yr Pro tier); chat-only format and pricing opacity disclosed..
Sources
Every fact above was checked against these sources. Where a claim comes from the provider and couldn't be independently verified, the text says so.