Skip to content
← Models
Open weightsNous Research/10 trustMetrics-checked
Hermes 4 70B logo

Hermes 4 70B

Open 70B hybrid-reasoning model tuned for steerability and low refusals

Visit official page →

About

Hermes 4 70B is Nous Research's 70B-parameter hybrid-mode reasoning model, a full-parameter fine-tune of Meta Llama-3.1-70B trained on ~5M samples / ~60B tokens of blended reasoning and non-reasoning data. It can either respond directly or deliberate inside explicit <think>…</think> traces, with a second training stage that caps reasoning length at ~30K tokens to stop overlong "thinking loops". It supports structured outputs (JSON mode, schema adherence), function calling and tool use, and is aligned for high steerability with broadly reduced refusal rates (SOTA on Nous's own RefusalBench). Weights are freely downloadable on Hugging Face in BF16, FP8 and GGUF variants; the model ships under the Llama 3.1 Community License, so check Meta's use restrictions before commercial deployment.

Specs

Context window

131,072 tokens

Pricing

$0.13 / $0.40 per 1M input/output tokens (Artificial Analysis via dataconomy, Apr 2026 — provider-dependent; varies across Chutes, Nebius, Luminal). No first-party pay-per-token price list published by Nous.

Free quota

Free chat access via Nous Chat; no published free API quota.

API access

No first-party usage API published; inference via third-party providers (Nous Portal, Chutes, Nebius, Luminal, per HF model card). Weights freely downloadable for self-hosting with vLLM/SGLang/Transformers.

Weights

Open weights

Released

August 26, 2025

Benchmarks

Provider-reported (Nous eval dataset on HF, NousResearch/eval-Hermes-4-70B-reasoning): AIME 24 73.5% · AIME 25 67.4% · MATH-500 95.6% · MMLU 88.4% · MMLU-Pro 80.7% · GPQA-Diamond 66.1% · ArenaHard 90.1% · Creative Writing v3 77.5%.

Independent: Artificial Analysis lists Intelligence Index 12.6 / Coding 9.2 / Math 11.3 (Apr 2026, measured on live inference endpoints). Press coverage (VentureBeat) frames it as competitive with ChatGPT-class models; no independent academic replication of the full table was found.

Provider-reported unless a source says otherwise. Benchmarks are marketing-adjacent by nature — treat them as directional.

Use cases

chatreasoningcodeagentsautomationdata

Trust score — 6/10

/10 trustMetrics-checked

Scored 6/10 (metrics tier, metrics-v1). Evidence: HF: NousResearch/Hermes-4-70B; HF downloads 1,482 (peer-normalized); released 413 days ago. Manual review: OpenRouter delisted the model page; pricing from Artificial Analysis (provider variance). License: Llama 3.1 Community License (700M MAU clause).

How the trust score is built

Full methodology →
Adoption · stars/downloads, log-scaled vs peers
5.3/10
Maintenance · recency, releases, issue load
5.0/10
Openness · license + docs
7.2/10
Manual review · sanity read + red-flag check
7.0/10
  • · HF: NousResearch/Hermes-4-70B
  • · HF downloads 1,482 (peer-normalized)
  • · released 413 days ago
  • · manual review: OpenRouter delisted the model page; pricing from Artificial Analysis (provider variance)

Sources